Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Krieg v. Tokusen HyTech Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Scott Krieg
Defendant:
Tokusen HyTech Inc. agent of d/b/a HyTech Spring and Machine Corp., Tokusen HyTech Inc. doing business as HyTech Spring and Machine Corp. and Kimberly Arthur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nix v. Cedar Springs Public Schools et al
as 1:2021cv00425
Defendant:
Jeff Rivard, Scott Smith, Matt Shoffner and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Robert Nix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Lunneen v. Berrien Springs, Village of et al
as 1:2020cv01007
Defendant:
Berrien County Sheriff's Department, Oronoko, Township of, Sheriff L. Paul Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Lunneen and Thomas E. Lunneen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinus et al v. Spring Lake, Village of
as 1:2020cv00985
Plaintiff:
Richard Martinus and Marianne Martinus
Defendant:
Spring Lake, Village of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West Michigan Band Instruments, LLC v. Spring Lake Public Schools
as 1:2016cv01132
Plaintiff:
West Michigan Band Instruments, LLC
Defendant:
Spring Lake Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00726
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Fair Housing Center of Southwest Michigan et al v. Spansail Court Apartments et al
as 1:2011cv00378
Plaintiff:
Fair Housing Center of Southwest Michigan , Nathaniel Lovely and Tammy Ketchum
Defendant:
Spansail Court Apartments, Spansail, L.L.C., Spring Arbor Apartments and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
