Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Hernandez #603331 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2010cv00715
Plaintiff:
Prince Jesse Hernandez #603331
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Haslett Police Department, Paula Manderfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoudamire #160195 v. Capello
as 2:2009cv00041
Petitioner:
Jesse Stoudamire #160195
Respondent:
Gary Capello
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gonzales #371929 v. Erickson et al
as 1:2008cv00910
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lee Gonzales #371929
Defendant:
Jake Erickson, Frank Elo, Unknown Haynie and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Flowers #534810 v. Sherry
as 2:2008cv00143
Petitioner:
Jesse Tawan Flowers #534810
Respondent:
Jeri-Ann Sherry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones #260563 v. Bergh et al
as 2:2008cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jesse E. Jones #260563
Defendant:
David Bergh, Michael Arkens, K. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones #260563 v. Stapleton et al
as 2:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
Jesse E. Jones #260563
Defendant:
Richard Stapleton and Linda Maki
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones #260563 v. Johnson et al
as 2:2007cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jesse E. Jones #260563
Defendant:
Robert Johnson, Dale Kurth, Mary Bonevelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mundy #350690 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2007cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jesse Mundy #350690
Defendant:
Patricia L. Caruso and Dave Burnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #317723 et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jack Smith #317723, Gary Francis Freeman Baublitz #164662, Jesse Myles Philips #167158, II and others
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia L. Caruso, Carol Howes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solis #110305 v. Howes
as 1:2007cv00151
Petitioner:
Jesse Solis #110305
Respondent:
Carol Howes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
