Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Burnett #200640 v. Macauley et al
as 1:2020cv01116
Defendant:
Matt Macauley, Wendy Lane and D. Bolton
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Burnett #200640
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon #202825 v. Washington et al
as 1:2018cv00158
Plaintiff:
John Junior Gordon #202825
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Unknown Harry, Unknown O'Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #883833 v. Harry et al
as 1:2017cv00759
Plaintiff:
Scott Smith #883833
Defendant:
Shirley Harry, Unknown Kowalski, B. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford #374376 v. Kennerly et al
as 1:2016cv00243
Plaintiff:
Elijah M. Ford #374376
Defendant:
Michael C. Kennerly, Roger Gerlach, Richard Czop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sieradzki #193629 v. Muskegon, County of et al
as 1:2015cv01340
Plaintiff:
Richard Michael Sieradzki #193629
Defendant:
Muskegon, County of, Unknown Griswald and Jamal Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters #155318 v. Simpson et al
as 1:2015cv00751
Plaintiff:
Gary Peters #155318
Defendant:
Brenda Simpson, Daniel H. Heyns, Kenneth McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrory #161192 v. Lepley et al
as 1:2013cv00536
Plaintiff:
Anthony McCrory #161192
Defendant:
Frederick J. Lepley, Mary Kelly and Cynthia Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane #143051 v. Michigan Parole Board
as 2:2013cv00090
Petitioner:
Raymond Lane #143051
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cook #128535 v. Cashler et al
as 1:2011cv00637
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Cook #128535
Defendant:
Unknown Cashler, Wade Wakefield, Mark O. Sutherby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Annabel #414234 v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2009cv00796
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Annabel #414234, II
Defendant:
J. Armstrong, Unknown Rutgers, Unknown Mygrants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
