Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Traczyk v. Aspirus, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00077
Defendant:
The Board of Directors of Aspirus, Inc., Unknown Parties, Aspirus, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly D. Traczyk
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Smith et al v. Kellogg Company et al
as 1:2018cv01341
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bouchard, Alice Donovan, Frank Pimental and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Company and Kellogg Sales Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Goulet v. Davenport University et al
as 1:2017cv00885
Plaintiff:
Lee Goulet
Defendant:
Davenport University , Benjamin Nelson and Kathy Natelborg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Anchor v. Hartford Public School District et al
as 1:2014cv00796
Plaintiff:
Kathy Anchor
Defendant:
Hartford Public School District and Andrew Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Yesner et al v. Borgess Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00429
Plaintiff:
Dawn Yesner and Eva Cornelius
Defendant:
Borgess Medical Center, Inc. , Kathy Grueter , Matthew Gamble and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hall v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 1:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Kathy Hall
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hall v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2012cv00387
Plaintiff:
Kathy Hall
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan LTD Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Scheppele et al v. Fifth Third Bank
as 1:2011cv00742
Plaintiff:
John Scheppele and Kathy Ballard
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lane v. Life Insurance Company of North America/CIGNA Corporation
as 1:2007cv00397
Plaintiff:
Kathy A. Lane
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
