Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fingal et al v. Ontonagon County et al
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fingal, Keith Kantor, Johanna McGee and others
Defendant:
Ontonagon County, Michele Smith, Alger County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Heeg, et al v. United Electrical Contractors, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00796
Plaintiff:
Travis Heeg, Dalton Parish, Andrew Crampton and others
Defendant:
United Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Vance v. Calhoun County Medical Care Facility et al
as 1:2020cv01024
Defendant:
Calhoun County Medical Care Facility and Calhoun County Department of Health and Human Services Board
Plaintiff:
Kelly Vance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vance v. Grand Rapids Housing Commission
as 1:2018cv01188
Plaintiff:
James Donald Vance, Jr.
Defendant:
Grand Rapids Housing Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wesco Insurance Company v. Morris et al
as 1:2017cv00869
Plaintiff:
Wesco Insurance Company
Defendant:
Christopher D. Morris, Lennon, Miller, O'Connor & Bartosiewicz, P.L.C. and Vance Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vance v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv00723
Plaintiff:
Regina Renee Vance
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vance v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 1:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Kevin Vance
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Smith v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv01065
Plaintiff:
Vance H. Smith
Defendant:
Northwestern Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Vance v. Electrolux Corporation
as 1:2015cv00939
Plaintiff:
Shirley Butler Vance
Defendant:
Electrolux Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
