Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nettles #271812 v. Wallis et al
as 2:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
Macking Nettles #271812, Jr.
Defendant:
Craig Wallis, Unknown Gimple, Unknown Portice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nettles #271812 v. Wallis et al
as 2:2020cv00241
Defendant:
Crystal Bigger, Unknown Portice, Craig Wallis and others
Plaintiff:
Macking Nettles #271812, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King #280752 v. Horton et al
as 2:2019cv00077
Defendant:
Unknown Wallis, Unknown Harrison, Unknown McLean and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Anthony King #280752
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson #441652 v. Wallis
as 2:2016cv00076
Plaintiff:
Anthony Johnson #441652
Defendant:
Unknown Wallis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley #259579 v. Atkinson, et al
as 2:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Marcus Kelley #259579
Defendant:
Kimberly Atkinson, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Sariano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Traini #461218 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00832
Plaintiff:
Tom Traini #461218
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, Dennis Straub and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Solomon #301631 v. Golloday et al
as 2:2011cv00287
Defendant:
Unknown Golloday, Glen Carol, Patricia L. Caruso and others
Plaintiff:
Martin T. Solomon #301631
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hood #235278 v. Woods et al
as 2:2010cv00368
Plaintiff:
Ronald King Hood #235278
Defendant:
Jeffrey Woods, Nick Ludwick, Richard Stapleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker #119674 v. Mackie et al
as 2:2010cv00285
Plaintiff:
Archie Baker #119674
Defendant:
Tom Mackie, Debra Cushman, Unknown Wallis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson #220082 v. Holm et al
as 2:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
Joely E. Jackson #220082
Defendant:
Bob Holm, Jim Wallis and Chad Lacount
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
