Cases 21 - 30 of 5,693
Mahlberg v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01989
Petitioner:
Arne Henry Mahlberg
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kalombo v. Matthew et al
as 0:2024cv01980
Plaintiff:
Pierre Kalombo
Defendant:
Matthew and Kandiyohi County Jail, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kalombo v. Skillet
as 0:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
Pierre Kalombo
Defendant:
Skillet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv01909
Petitioner:
Alvin Perkins
Respondent:
Linda Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Semler v. Johnston et al
as 0:2024cv01850
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Semler
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Brian Ninneman and Marc Zika
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. USA
as 0:2024cv01844
Petitioner:
Victor Devon Edwards
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Howard v. Red Lake band of Chippewa et al
as 0:2024cv01797
Petitioner:
Santee Howard
Respondent:
Red Lake band of Chippewa and Red Lake tribal Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sayers v. Redlake Band of chippewa et al
as 0:2024cv01799
Petitioner:
Dezmyn Sayers
Respondent:
Redlake Band of chippewa and Redlake nation courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Campbell v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01788
Petitioner:
Clifton Scott Campbell
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rulford v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv01741
Petitioner:
Tayrel Lamar Rulford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
