Cases 101 - 110 of 114
Martin v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv00680
Petitioner:
Favis Clay Martin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thompson v. Dormire et al
as 4:2009cv00617
Plaintiff:
Lamont Thompson
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Reina Martin, Rhonda Quigly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lomack v. Correctional Medical Services (CMS) et al
as 4:2009cv00557
Plaintiff:
Robert Lomack
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services (CMS), Mike Kemna, Unknown Superintendent, Licking Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Hakala et al
as 4:2009cv00360
Plaintiff:
Martin Akeem Daniel
Defendant:
Michael Hakala, Larry Crawford, Steve Larkins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Meyer et al
as 4:2009cv00359
Plaintiff:
Fate Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Dana Meyer and Alfred Garcia
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Burns v. Dixon et al
as 4:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
Ronald Burns
Defendant:
Jeffrey S. Dixon, Abraham Reddick, Michael D. Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ellis v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2008cv02028
Plaintiff:
Marcus N. Ellis
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Martin Richard Minnigerode, Booneville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Roper et al
as 4:2008cv00931
Petitioner:
Stanley Johnson
Respondent:
Don Roper and Marty Martin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grass v. Kettle et al
as 4:2008cv00665
Plaintiff:
Lloyd E. Grass
Defendant:
Janet Kettle, Anne Chambers, Charlene Coe-Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pulliam v. Medical Provider et al
as 4:2008cv00392
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pulliam
Defendant:
Unknown Medical Provider, Medical Staff, Randy Martin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
