Cases 71 - 80 of 10,332
Bynum v. City of Bridgton MO. et al
as 4:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Darryl R. Bynum
Defendant:
City of Bridgton MO. and St. Louis County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuget v. USA
as 4:2024cv00579
Petitioner:
Justin Fuget
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Whittaker v. Owens et al
as 4:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Robert Whittaker
Defendant:
Dr. Shannon K. Owens, Dale Glass, Unknown Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Justin Ardis Easley
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Hannibal Police Department, Matthew Wilt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dinkins v. USA
as 4:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
Robert O. Dinkins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Corey C. Lewis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Darden v. Huhn
as 4:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
Dominique Deangelo Darden
Respondent:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Darden v. Luechtefeld et al
as 4:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Dominique Deangelo Darden
Defendant:
Debra Luechtefeld, Kyle Clinkingbeard, Valerie Huhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter et al v. Fredrickson et al
as 2:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Ronald Carter and Shirley Carter
Defendant:
Aaron Fredrickson, Terry Helmick and Shelby County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00550
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
