Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,332
Dale v. Morris et al
as 4:2024cv00813
Plaintiff: Jody Darna Dale, Jr.
Defendant: Kelly Morris, Caseworker Unknown Hill, COIII Unknown Volkart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Pitlyk
as 4:2024cv00814
Plaintiff: Barry Jackson
Defendant: Sarah E. Pitlyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiseman v. USA
as 4:2024cv00809
Petitioner: Edward Wiseman
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Milcendeau v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00108
Petitioner: David James Milcendeau
Respondent: Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bynum v. City of Bridgton Police Dept.
as 4:2024cv00799
Plaintiff: Darryl R Bynum, Jr
Defendant: City of Bridgton Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
bin Bey v. Gayden et al
as 4:2024cv00806
Plaintiff: Dreke bin Bey
Defendant: Lt. Unknown Gayden and Cpt. Unknown Fowelkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Hamm
as 4:2024cv00803
Plaintiff: Tyson James Wade
Defendant: Officer Unknown Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushing v. Cape Girardeau City Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00107
Plaintiff: Shaun Rushing
Defendant: Cape Girardeau City Police Department, Missouri State Police Agency and Cape Girardeau Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gunther v. Missouri Department of Mental Health
as 4:2024cv00796
Plaintiff: Rex S. Gunther
Defendant: Missouri Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. USA
as 4:2024cv00779
Petitioner: Charles Gray
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?