Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Grayned v. Walgreens "Walgreens Co."
as 4:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Lamont Grayned
Defendant:
Walgreens "Walgreens Co."
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carrara v. Walgreens Co.
as 4:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Danielle Carrara
Defendant:
Walgreens Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kopp v. Walgreen Co.
as 4:2021cv00181
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. doing business as Walgreens #05667
Plaintiff:
Alice M. Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Polk County, Missouri v. Allergan PLC et al
as 4:2019cv03085
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Kathe Sackler, Michael Babich and others
Plaintiff:
Polk County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Goulart v. Walgreen Co.
as 4:2019cv03079
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Brandi Goulart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lincoln County v. Sackler et al
as 4:2019cv02953
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Caremark RX, LLC, Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff:
Lincoln County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Camden County v. Williams et al
as 4:2019cv02930
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Caremark RX, LLC, Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff:
Camden County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
St. Francois County v. Dannie E. Williams, M.D. et al
as 4:2019cv01722
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Caremark RX, LLC, Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff:
St. Francois County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jefferson County et al v. Williams et al
as 4:2019cv00157
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Express Scripts Holding Company, Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Taney County, Ste Genevieve County, City of Joplin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duran v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 4:2018cv02016
Plaintiff:
DONNA DURAN
Defendant:
ARCP WG ST. LOUIS MO, LLC and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
