Cases 71 - 80 of 2,989
Carter et al v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Michael Carter, Brian Cosby, Ernest Snipes and others
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, City of St. Louis Refuse Division and Timothy Banta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
City of Chesterfield v. Rosa
as 4:2023cv01534
Plaintiff:
City of Chesterfield
Defendant:
Kenneth Rosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hobson v. Santino
as 4:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Yule Hobson
Defendant:
Micheac Santno and Micheal Santino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saali v. Walmart
as 4:2023cv01499
Plaintiff:
Christina Saali
Defendant:
Walmart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phillips v. Drago et al
as 4:2023cv01486
Plaintiff:
Ryan Drago and Carlos Phillips
Defendant:
City of St. Louis and Ryan J. Drago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reinhardt v. City of Chesterfield Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
Timothy Reinhardt
Defendant:
City of Chesterfield Missouri, Lance Rouse and Gregory Rupp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. IBEW Local 1
as 4:2023cv01470
Plaintiff:
Earnie Bradley
Defendant:
IBEW Local 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
The Estate of Joshua Charles Davis v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv01443
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Joshua Charles Davis
Defendant:
The United States of America, The Department of Veterans Affairs, The Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Felton v. Autozone, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01427
Plaintiff:
Ronnell Felton
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc. and Tiara Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Austell v. City of Pagedale
as 4:2023cv01419
Plaintiff:
Janet L. Austell
Defendant:
City of Pagedale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
