Cases 121 - 130 of 6,376
Shire v. Stobie
as 4:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Marie Dean, Brooke J. Marr, Justin E. Shire and others
Defendant:
Laura Hawk Stobie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armes v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jacob B. Armes
Defendant:
United States of America and Jennifer Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bondarenko v. City of Bridgeton et al
as 4:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Vlad Bondarenko
Defendant:
City of Bridgeton, Bridgeton Police Department, Officer Unknown Baver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bell v. Echols et al
as 4:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sheneka Denise Bell
Defendant:
Victoria Denise Echols and St. Louis City Children Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Dean et al v. Stobie
as 4:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Marie Dean, Brooke J. Marr, Justin E. Shire and others
Defendant:
Laura Hawk Stobie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
