Cases 1 - 10 of 10
A.P. et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2020cv01547
Defendant:
Pamela Clark, Andrew Vanderusen, Amber Bass and others
Plaintiff:
Angie Pollock, A.P., G.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ostrowski v. Office of Elections et al
as 1:2020cv00209
Defendant:
Lt. Governor Spencer Cox, Secretary of State Jim Condos, Wisconsin Election Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ostrowski
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zorich v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2017cv01522
Plaintiff:
Angela Zorich
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Robert M Rinck, Corey Zavorka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green et al v. City of St. Louis Missouri
as 4:2015cv01433
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri
Plaintiff:
Percy Green, III , Abram Pruitt, Jr. , Harrith RT Ahmad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Zorich v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2015cv00871
Plaintiff:
Angela Zorich
Defendant:
St. Louis County , Corey Zavorka and Robert M Rinck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swiish, LLC. et al v. Nixon et al
as 4:2014cv02089
Plaintiff:
Swiish, LLC. , Corey Nickson-Clark and Chantelle Nickson-Clark
Defendant:
Jay Nixon , Ronald K. Replogle , Missouri Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murph v. Mitchell
as 1:2011cv00114
Plaintiff:
Denise Murph
Defendant:
Corey Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2010cv00548
Plaintiff:
Rapheal Hayes
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Stanton Amy Parker, Latrica M. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steward v. Pulaski Bank et al
as 4:2007cv00340
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Steward
Defendant:
Pulaski Bank, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
