Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gaines v. Windsor C-1 School Board et al
as 4:2023cv01207
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gaines
Defendant:
Windsor C-1 School Board, Dr. Rachel Montgomery, Dr. Jason King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold v. Augustine et al
as 4:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Arnold
Defendant:
Kenneth P. Augustine, Franklin County Sheriff's Office, Judge Stanley Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Blackhead et al
as 2:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Bell
Defendant:
Chanda Blackhead, Stephanie Wehmeir, Kevin Neese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cunningham et al v. Thornhill et al
as 4:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
James Cunningham and Chanda McKee
Defendant:
Judge Matthew Thornhill, Brandon T Pittenger, Pittenger Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodgers v. SLMPD Arresting Officers et al
as 4:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Tork Rodgers
Defendant:
SLMPD Arresting Officers, EMASS, Total Court Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harlow v. Judge et al
as 4:2019cv01403
Defendant:
Brad Judge, Nicholas Newberry, The City of Desloge, MO and others
Plaintiff:
Preston Harlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gartelos v. Judge of Court, Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit, Room #105 et al
as 4:2007cv01910
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Peter Gartelos
Defendant:
Judge of Court, Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit, Room #105, St. Louis, City of and State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
