Cases 11 - 20 of 10,296
McGee v. Anderson et al
as 4:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Kevin Douglas McGee
Defendant:
CEO Donna Anderson, Valerie Huhn and Debra Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Missouri Department of Corrections, Missouri Parole Board
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
DeMun D. Walker
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Missouri Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. USA
as 4:2024cv00638
Petitioner:
Timothy Cross
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walton v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Walton
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Adam A. Field and Gabriel E. Gore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Psychiatrist et al
as 4:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Unknown Psychiatrist, Barnes Jewish Psychiatric Care Unit and Barnes Jewish Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windeknecht v. Bullock et al
as 4:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Windeknecht
Defendant:
Mr. Christopher Bullock, Chief of St. Francois Police Dept., Mr. Michael Blake Dudley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Davidson v. Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 4:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Defendant:
Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Brown
as 4:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Omar T. Muhammad
Defendant:
Brenden Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Courtney v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00627
Petitioner:
Antonio Courtney
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul v. Vandergriff
as 4:2024cv00623
Petitioner:
Rico Paul
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
