Cases 41 - 50 of 805
Woods v. Annesser et al
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Heather Annesser, Rosanna Williams, Molly Leija and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Sailor et al
as 4:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Danielle Sailor, Raymond Bonds Sr. and Diane Meeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Woods v. Fluharty et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Wesley Fluharty, Jane/John Doe 1, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grochowski, Sr. v. Resort Legal Service, LLC
as 4:2022cv01378
Plaintiff:
Alan Grochowski, Sr.
Defendant:
Resort Legal Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Long v. Burns
as 4:2022cv01353
Petitioner:
Mario B. Long, Sr.
Respondent:
Robert Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Boozer v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv01347
Plaintiff:
Everett N. Boozer, Sr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Farwell v. Hunter
as 4:2022cv01126
Plaintiff:
Angel Farwell
Defendant:
David Hunter, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
French, Sr. v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. French, Sr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
