Cases 41 - 50 of 210
Schmidt v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00691
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Schmidt
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt v. Hosley International, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00614
Plaintiff:
Aaron Schmidt
Defendant:
Hosley International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold v. The City of Florissant, Missouri et al
as 4:2015cv00478
Plaintiff:
Joy Arnold
Defendant:
The City of Florissant, Missouri, Kyle Feldmann, Timothy Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodhouse et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00344
Plaintiff:
Sarah Rodhouse , Misty Mackey , Sharon Mavis and others
Defendant:
Skechers USA, Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. United States et al
as 4:2014cv01773
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
United States, Barack H. Obama, NSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2014mc00386
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Lawrence P. Schmidt, Futuregen Company, Commercial Equity Partners, Ltd. and others
Receiver:
Marion Hecht
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Schmidt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv00044
Plaintiff:
Wanda J Schmidt
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Sharp v. Jetro Holdings, LLC. et al.
as 4:2013cv02261
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Sharp
Defendant:
Jetro Holdings, LLC and David W. Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Schmidt v. Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
as 4:2013cv01090
Plaintiff:
Ladon Schmidt
Defendant:
Encore Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
