Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Medicine Shoppe International, Inc. v. Harrison Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv01481
Plaintiff:
Medicine Shoppe International, Inc.
Defendant:
Harrison Enterprises, Inc., George Harrison and Elaine Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Messer v. Warren County Jail et al
as 4:2009cv00362
Plaintiff:
Amanda D. Messer
Defendant:
Warren County Jail, Unknown Harrison, Unknown Stoneburger and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ellis v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2008cv02028
Plaintiff:
Marcus N. Ellis
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Martin Richard Minnigerode, Booneville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McGee-El v. Hartegan
as 2:2008cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jimmie T. McGee-El
Defendant:
Chandra Hartegan, Tracy Harrison, Debra Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harrison v. Wells et al
as 2:2008cv00040
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Harrison
Defendant:
Jim Wells, Michael Starman, Curt Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wolfinbarger v. Harrison Ross Byck, Esq., P.C.
as 4:2008cv00278
Defendant:
Harrison Ross Byck, Esq., P.C.
Plaintiff:
Margaret Wolfinbarger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Harrison v. Moss et al
as 4:2007cv01992
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Harrison
Defendant:
E. J. Moss, Unknown Ruiz, Unknown Feeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
