Cases 61 - 70 of 51,166
Smith v. Bush
as 4:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Leonard Smith
Defendant:
Eldrick Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
United States of America v. Naushad, M.D. P.C. et al
as 4:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Abdul Naushad, M.D. P.C., Advanced Pain Centers and Abdul Naushad, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Perry et al v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Shanae Perry
Defendant:
Andrew C. Smith and Smitty's Shuttle Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Thompson v. Haper et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Terrique Thompson
Defendant:
Unknown Haper, Unknown Womack, C. Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khalaf v. Saint Louis University
as 4:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Hussein Khalaf
Defendant:
Saint Louis University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vaughn v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Steven Vaughn
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cranmer v. Securus-J-Pay et al
as 4:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Roy T. Cranmer
Defendant:
Securus-J-Pay, Potosi Correctional Center and Ms. Unknown Sansegraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayburn et al v. Mers Missouri Goodwill Industries
as 4:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Rayburn and Marquita Patterson
Defendant:
Mers Missouri Goodwill Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
