Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Human v. BMW (U.S.) Holding Corp. et al
as 4:2023cv01577
Plaintiff:
Daniel Human
Defendant:
BMW (U.S.) Holding Corp. d/b/a BMW of West St. Louis and John and Jane Does 1 - 4 BMW (U.S) Holding Corp. d/b/a BMW of West St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Lougin et al v. City of Saint. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2019cv00301
Defendant:
Chris Roth, John Doe's 1-4, Rick Lauman and others
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Lougin and Francesco R. Russo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolbert v. Heavner, Beyers & Mihlar, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv01567
Defendant:
Heavner, Beyers & Mihlar, LLC and DOES 1-4
Plaintiff:
Martha Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nicholson v. Consumer Collection Management, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01537
Defendant:
Consumer Collection Management, Inc. and DOES 1-4
Plaintiff:
Kim P Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shears v. Afni, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01449
Plaintiff:
Tommie L Shears
Defendant:
Afni, Inc. and DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nicholson v. Hunter Warfield, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01446
Plaintiff:
Kim Nicholson
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield, Inc. and DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01318
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01217
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Turner v. Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv01222
Plaintiff:
Antionette Turner
Defendant:
Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group, LLC and DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fowler v. Miller & Steeno, P.C. et al
as 4:2017cv01180
Defendant:
Miller & Steeno, P.C. , Opportunity Financial, LLC and DOES 1-4
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Fowler
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
