Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Meeks v. Norman et al
as 4:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Malcolm A. Meeks
Defendant:
Officer J. Norman and Breanna D. Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Creal et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00774
Plaintiff:
Nefertiti Edwards, Michael McAffee, Kelly Kaltenbach and others
Defendant:
PTI Royston, LLC d/b/a Pharma Tech Industries, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., PTI Union, LLC d/b/a Pharma Tech Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Engel v. Hillsboro Police Dept, et al
as 4:2020cv01803
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant:
Hillsboro Police Dept., ERDCC, Sentor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00253
Plaintiff:
Lavonda Mills
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Engel v. Senator MO et al
as 4:2020cv01688
Defendant:
Unknown Religious Services, Unknown Sg, IPO ERDCC and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. CO1 et al
as 4:2020cv01686
Defendant:
Hillsboro Police Dept., Unknown Sg, Unknown Senator MO and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
