Cases 1 - 10 of 105
United States of America v. Askins et al
as 4:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Orlando Askins, The Askins Development Group, LLC and Shaw Holding Group LLC
Shaw v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 4:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Ronald Shaw
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Brown v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Correction et al
as 4:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Juan V. Brown
Defendant:
Director, Missouri Dept. of Correction, Marvin Brannum, Unknown Hampton CO II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. USA
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
Antonio Shaw
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones-Williams v. Missouri State et al
as 4:2023cv00947
Defendant:
Beverly Barnett Parker, Missouri State, County of St. Louis and others
Plaintiff:
Rozina Rhonda Jones-Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Adrian Shaw
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
David Wilson, Chris DeWeese, Demeyon Watie and others
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Warden Hancock, Major Minchue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shaw v. Adams
as 4:2021cv00707
Petitioner:
Adrian Darcy Shaw
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaw v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00086
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Mary Jane Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
