Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Cases 11 - 20 of 10,452
Prewitt v. Department of Mental Health
as 2:2024cv04087
Plaintiff: Joshua Ryan Prewitt
Defendant: Department of Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nutall v. Page
as 4:2024cv00243
Petitioner: Willie James Nutall
Respondent: Justine Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raybourn v. Centurion Medical Services, et al
as 5:2024cv06072
Plaintiff: Connie Ann Raybourn
Defendant: Missouri Department of Corrections, Chris McBee, Todd Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Busby v. Galbreath et al
as 2:2024cv04086
Plaintiff: Dennis Busby
Defendant: Andrea Galbreath and Ike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ornelas v. USA
as 4:2024cv00224
Petitioner: Sonia Ornelas
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Elliott v. State of Missouri
as 4:2024cv00357
Petitioner: Stephen Lee Elliott
Respondent: State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keen v. Cook et al
as 6:2024cv03086
Plaintiff: CeCil Keen
Defendant: Darin Cook and DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Layton et al
as 2:2024cv04047
Plaintiff: Aceon Deon Mosley
Defendant: Justin D. Layton, Raina Martin, Letitia Dawn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Burns
as 4:2024cv00355
Plaintiff: Frederick Martin
Defendant: Robert P. Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv06051
Plaintiff: DaRon Clay
Defendant: Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?