Cases 51 - 60 of 10,464
Wry v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv04060
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wry
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Monica Arcc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Goodwin
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moody v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Moody
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Billy Dunbar, Almalee Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuire v. Cheney et al
as 3:2024cv05027
Plaintiff:
Tommas McGuire
Defendant:
Maleia Cheney and McDonald County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
San Paolo v. USA
as 6:2024cv03096
Petitioner:
Joseph San Paolo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bush v. Stange
as 6:2024cv03101
Petitioner:
Jordan Bush
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv06051
Plaintiff:
DaRon Clay
Defendant:
Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. City of St Joseph, Missouri et al
as 5:2024cv06050
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Burgess
Defendant:
City of St Joseph, Missouri, St. Joseph Police Department, Officer Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glasgow v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Shannon M Glasgow
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Local Officials, Federal Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutson v. Vandergriff
as 2:2024cv04051
Petitioner:
Calvin Hutson
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
