Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Williams v. City of Independence, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
Monique S. Williams
Defendant:
City of Independence, Missouri and Adam Dustman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. City of Lake Ozark, Missouri et al
as 2:2023cv04081
Plaintiff:
Channer Jones
Defendant:
City of Lake Ozark, Missouri, Kelly Lowe, Adam Khachi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv03122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Dixon et al
as 2:2019cv04178
Defendant:
Vernon D McKague, Jr., Michael R Dixon, Jr, Scott G. Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Scott Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yohn v. Comprehensive Mental Health and Research Psychiatric Center et al
as 4:2019cv00438
Defendant:
Kerri Donovan, Comprehensive Mental Health, Dr. Rajendra Paladugu and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy D. Yohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Lesmeister v. Hilty
as 4:2018cv00720
Plaintiff:
Adam E Lesmeister
Defendant:
Lee Hilty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emerald Pointe, LLC v. Taney County Planning Commission et al
as 6:2017cv03182
Plaintiff:
Emerald Pointe, LLC
Defendant:
Taney County Planning Commission , Taney County Board of Adjustment , Steve Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Henke v. Collins et al
as 4:2016cv00371
Plaintiff:
Adam Henke
Defendant:
Daniel Collins , Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners , Michael Rader and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Heath v. Plummer et al
as 6:2016cv03152
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Heath
Defendant:
Mike Plummer , Adam Wolf , James Lachance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alexander v. Plummer et al
as 6:2016cv03151
Plaintiff:
Orin Alexander
Defendant:
Mike Plummer , Adam Wolf , James Lachance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
