Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hinkle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv05050
Plaintiff:
William Hinkle
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MORITZ v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 6:2020cv03362
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MORITZ
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rock-Jones v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00844
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amanda Rock-Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Murray v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 6:2020cv03276
Plaintiff:
Adrian Murray
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rushing v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00685
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Terrel Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lyons v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv03267
Plaintiff:
Wayne Lyons
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Higgs v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 6:2020cv03264
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc, C R Bard Inc, McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Higgs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reeves v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 6:2020cv03259
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
John Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tisdale v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 6:2020cv03260
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Lucille Tisdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCray v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 6:2020cv03261
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly McCray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
