Cases 101 - 110 of 5,704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv06030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
McDannell v. City of Gladstone et al
as 4:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Christopher M McDannell
Defendant:
City of Gladstone, Jean Moore, Gladstone Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv06028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv06027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rodrigues v. Outmatch, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv06025
Plaintiff:
Mark Rodrigues
Defendant:
Outmatch, Inc. and Outmatch Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Barnes et al v. Payne et al
as 4:2024mc09003
Plaintiff:
Nathan Barnes, Susannah Kilpatrick and Darren Kilpatrick
Defendant:
Lawrence Payne and Patricia Payne
Interested Party:
American Express
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kirk v. City of St. Joseph, Missouri et al
as 5:2024cv06023
Plaintiff:
Brian Kirk
Defendant:
City of St. Joseph, Missouri, John Josendale, Marty Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
