Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Miller v. Joan Long Eller Investment Company, LLC
as 6:2011cv03513
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Miller
Defendant:
Joan Long Eller Investment Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lohnes v. Balaji Investments, LLC
as 4:2011cv00970
Plaintiff:
Ruth Lohnes
Defendant:
Balaji Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv03420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Nash et al v. PB Chestnut AZ 2, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00680
Plaintiff:
Lakisha Nash and J. G.
Defendant:
PB Chestnut AZ 2, LLC, Bridge Co-Investment Fund 1 Chestnut, LLC and BGS Private Real Estate Fund Chestnut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Prewitt et al v. Camden County, Missouri et al
as 2:2009cv04126
Plaintiff:
Gary Prewitt, Gary Prewitt, Glacier Park Investments, LLC and others
Defendant:
Camden County, Missouri, Camden County Commission, Beverly Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. RDK Property Management et al
as 2:2008cv04270
Plaintiff:
Kietra Jones
Defendant:
RDK Property Management, Central Missouri Community Section 8, Callahan Investment One LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv03166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
