Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,719
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Fly v. Woodcock et al
as 6:2024cv03151
Plaintiff: Kenneth Fly
Defendant: Deputy Jacob Woodcock and Christian County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Taylor v. Bolton et al
as 6:2024cv03148
Plaintiff: Gary Taylor
Defendant: Taylor Bolton, Steven Hartman and City of Springfield, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Adkins v. Skivers et al
as 4:2024cv00343
Plaintiff: Robert Joshua Adkins
Defendant: Officer Jason Skivers, City of Sugar Creek, Officer Ethan Meier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03144
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04077
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
St. Clair v. Kansas City Art Institute
as 4:2024cv00337
Plaintiff: Kathy St. Clair
Defendant: Kansas City Art Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?