Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
McKaig et al v. Taney County Commissioner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv04014
Plaintiff: Larry McKaig and Heather McKaig
Defendant: Taney County Commissioner , Taney County Planning Commission , Taney County Board of Adjustment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv00814
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04084
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00933
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Type: Civil Rights None
Sciolaro v. Hagerty et al
as 4:2009cv00512
Plaintiff: Dana M Sciolaro
Defendant: Brian S Hagerty, R.B. McGinnis, Kerrick Alumbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv04003
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00890
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv04210
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Simmons et al v. Petty et al
as 2:2007cv04086
Plaintiff: Charles Simmons and Kelly Simmons
Defendant: Jim Petty, Darin J. Lutz, J. D. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?