Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Tillman v. Pash et al
as 5:2015cv06172
Plaintiff: Marshall A Tillman
Defendant: Ronda Pash, Karen Blakeman and John Matthew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nalls v. Jackson et al
as 6:2015cv03511
Plaintiff: Anthony Nalls
Defendant: Jackson, Roger Terry, Michelle Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owen v. Carlstrom et al
as 6:2015cv03139
Plaintiff: Ronnie Lee Owen
Defendant: Sarah Carlstrom and Sue Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marshall v. Pash We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv01032
Petitioner: Michael Eugene Marshall
Respondent: Ronda Pash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hunter v. Herrington et al
as 6:2014cv03366
Petitioner: Michael Hunter
Respondent: Ron Herrington, US Marshals Service and Linda Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stine v. US Marshal Justice Prisoner Air Transport Division et al
as 6:2014cv03351
Plaintiff: Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant: US Marshal Justice Prisoner Air Transport Division, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Owen v. Carlstrom et al
as 6:2014cv03156
Petitioner: Ronnie Lee Owen
Respondent: Sarah Carlstrom, Betsy Unknown and Sue Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Owen v. Carlstrom et al
as 6:2014cv03129
Plaintiff: Ronnie Lee Owen
Defendant: Sarah Carlstrom, Sue Marshall and Betsy Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woolridge v. US Marshals Service et al
as 4:2014cv00243
Plaintiff: Joshua Todd Woolridge
Defendant: US Marshals Service and Bryan H. Cutter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilmore v. Keeler et al
as 4:2013cv01148
Plaintiff: Charles M. Gilmore
Defendant: Scott Keeler, Sammy Bowden and US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?