Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Cases 21 - 30 of 10,455
Ornelas v. USA
as 4:2024cv00224
Petitioner: Sonia Ornelas
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Elliott v. State of Missouri
as 4:2024cv00357
Petitioner: Stephen Lee Elliott
Respondent: State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keen v. Cook et al
as 6:2024cv03086
Plaintiff: CeCil Keen
Defendant: Darin Cook and DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Layton et al
as 2:2024cv04047
Plaintiff: Aceon Deon Mosley
Defendant: Justin D. Layton, Raina Martin, Letitia Dawn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Burns
as 4:2024cv00355
Plaintiff: Frederick Martin
Defendant: Robert P. Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv06051
Plaintiff: DaRon Clay
Defendant: Western Reception Diagnostic and Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00237
Petitioner: Preston Moore
Respondent: Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moseley v. Henderson et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff: Kelshaun D Moseley
Defendant: Henderson, Watson, Ahka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff: Trey Tarell Bradley
Defendant: Mike Parson, Andrew Bailey, Brent Teichman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hutson v. Vandergriff
as 2:2024cv04051
Petitioner: Calvin Hutson
Respondent: David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?