Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Miller v. Buckner et al
as 6:2021cv03081
Defendant:
William E Thesson, Kendra Cantrell, Gregory Dugger and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Stringer et al
as 2:2019cv04148
Defendant:
Stephanie Hintz, Jaime Waller, Denise Hacker and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Fulton State Hospital et al
as 2:2019cv04105
Defendant:
Janet Laffy, Karen Digh Allen, Jaime Waller and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. State of Missouri et al
as 5:2018cv06093
Plaintiff:
Richard W Robertson
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Department of Corrections and Anne L. Precythe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Good et al
as 6:2018cv03141
Plaintiff:
Jesse A. Bell
Defendant:
Timothy Good, Bradley R. Routh, Tammy Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2017cv04042
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Robertson
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Board of Probation and Parole and Nathan Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. State of Missouri et al
as 5:2016cv06143
Plaintiff:
Micheal Duane Robertson
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Buchanan County, Missouri and Patrick K Robb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2016cv00963
Plaintiff:
Micheal Duane Robertson
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Board of Probation & Parole and Nathan Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ritter et al
as 6:2015cv03295
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kelvin Williams
Defendant:
Daniel J. Ritter, Angular, Jeremy Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Sigman et al
as 6:2015cv03286
Plaintiff:
Irvin Robertson
Defendant:
James Sigman, Smith and Brandon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
