Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Mainieri v. USA
as 4:2024cv00335
Petitioner:
Adam Joseph Mainieri
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Moore v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Preston Moore
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Shallon Hawkins
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. USA
as 2:2024cv04003
Petitioner:
Shunta Lamont Adams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. The United States of America et al
as 6:2023cv03345
Plaintiff:
Clyde B Johnson
Defendant:
The United States of America, Stephanie Swords, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Adams v. MO D.O.C. Corizon/Centurion
as 5:2023cv04189
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lyn Adams
Defendant:
MO D.O.C. Corizon and MO D.O.C. Centurion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schumer v. Jereda et al
as 2:2023cv04061
Plaintiff:
Tyler Raphael Schumer
Defendant:
Justin K Jereda, Schaeffer, Adam Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilley v. Precythe et al
as 6:2023cv03073
Petitioner:
Joshua R Gilley
Respondent:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams and Eric Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rich v. Archibeque et al
as 4:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
William Lee Rich
Defendant:
Adam Bradley Archibeque and Marshall Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDonald v. Buchanan County Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv06097
Plaintiff:
Valdez McDonald
Defendant:
Buchanan County Police Department, Patrick Robb, Broadus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
