Cases 21 - 30 of 246
King v. Ryder et al
as 2:2022cv04190
Plaintiff:
Christopher King
Defendant:
Phillip Ryder, Chad Hall, Jacob Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lewis et al
as 6:2022cv03327
Plaintiff:
John R Jones
Defendant:
Jason Lewis, Michele Buckner, Missy Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Precythe et al
as 2:2023cv04009
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eugene Day
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe and Julie Kempker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Precythe et al
as 2:2022cv04186
Plaintiff:
Rico Ricardo Paul
Defendant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Jason Lewis, Anna Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner et al v. Lewis
as 6:2022cv03311
Plaintiff:
Oscar Garner, John R Jones, Eric Crawford and others
Defendant:
Jason Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Chrysler Capital et al
as 4:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis and Robert Lewis Davis Jr.
Defendant:
Chrysler Capital, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Bank N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Flemming et al v. Bates County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Antonio Flemming, Tavion Reshond Jones, Timothy S. Reed and others
Defendant:
Bates County Jail and Brant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinderman v. Parsons et al
as 6:2022cv03154
Plaintiff:
Karl Hinderman
Defendant:
Cassidy Parsons, Peter S Kirn, Pamela Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Buckner
as 2:2022cv04105
Petitioner:
Glen Earl Lewis
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Vandergriff
as 4:2022cv00291
Petitioner:
Divonte L Lewis
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
