Cases 31 - 40 of 573
Zamora v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Laura Ann Zamora
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Henderson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Kathlene Ann Henderson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hayes v. Parson et al
as 2:2023cv04119
Plaintiff:
Dustin A Hayes
Defendant:
Mike Parson, Anne L. Precythe, Julie Kempker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ginn v. Sherer et al
as 5:2023cv06059
Plaintiff:
Joseph Eugene Ginn
Defendant:
Blake C Sherer, Tracy M McFadin, Megan Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v Missouri Department of Corrections, et al.
as 2:2023cv04090
Plaintiff:
Bryon L Griffin
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Anne L. Precythe, Raina Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04078
Plaintiff:
Stephan D Woods
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., Centurion Managed Care, Anne L. Precythe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gastreich v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv04067
Plaintiff:
Kelly Ann Gastreich
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wolf v. Precythe et al
as 2:2023cv04057
Plaintiff:
Amber Wolf
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Dan Redington, Centurion of Missouri, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03075
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ann Wilson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gilley v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00167
Petitioner:
Joshua R Gilley
Respondent:
Anne L. Precythe, Tim Freeman and Eric Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
