Cases 51 - 60 of 89
Strickland et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2013cv03372
Plaintiff:
Willie Strickland and Bobby Watts
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Erby v. Sanders et al
as 6:2013cv03362
Plaintiff:
Fred Erby
Defendant:
Linda Sanders, Patricia Williams, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mackovich v. Richardson et al
as 6:2013cv03127
Petitioner:
John Vincent Mackovich
Respondent:
Richardson, Eric Holder and Federal Bureau of Prisons Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vitatoe v. Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2013cv03064
Petitioner:
Michael John Vitatoe
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Charles Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 6:2012cv03331
Petitioner:
Michael L Johnson
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
EMBREY v. SAMUELS et al
as 6:2012cv03235
Movant:
William J.R. Embrey
Respondent:
CHARLES SAMUELS, JR and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hughley v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2012cv03087
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hughley
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, T Satterly and Marty C Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2012cv03074
Plaintiff:
Damion Hardy
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, M.C.F.P., Springfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2012cv03073
Plaintiff:
Damion Hardy
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2012cv03075
Plaintiff:
Damion Hardy
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Metropolitan Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
