Cases 51 - 60 of 943
Smith v. Kozinski
as 5:2022cv06135
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Mike Kozinsri and Mike Kozinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Gannett Media Corp. et al
as 4:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Campbell
Defendant:
Gannett Media Corp., Pacific Daily News, The Gadsden Times and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Merritt v. Marquart et al
as 5:2022cv06133
Plaintiff:
Logan Wayne Merritt
Defendant:
Keith Marquart, Rebecca Spencer, Patrick Robb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
O'Connor v. Smith
as 4:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Connor
Defendant:
Nicholas Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Smith v. Pettis County et al
as 2:2022cv04165
Plaintiff:
Donna Smith
Defendant:
Pettis County, Brad Anders, Sam Hargrave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Potter v. Lett et al
as 4:2022cv00710
Plaintiff:
Jason M Potter
Defendant:
Stacey Lett, Michael Barrett, Alan D Pratzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Gorman et al
as 4:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Ohio Security Insurance Company
Defendant:
Joseph Gorman, Terry Cooper, Marcus E Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Potter v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jason M Potter
Defendant:
Andrew Jones, City of Lee's Summit, Lee's Summit Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steinmetz v. Smith, et al.
as 6:2022cv03237
Plaintiff:
Oscar Steinmetz
Defendant:
Michael Smith, USMCFP Mail Room Staff, A. Deatherage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
