Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Diamond Resorts Corporation v. Mutual Release Corporation et al
as 6:2018cv03053
Defendant: Mutual Release Corporation a/k/a 417 MRC LLC, a Missouri limited liability company, Dan Chudy, Joseph Dickleman and others
Plaintiff: Diamond Resorts Corporation, a Maryland corporation and Diamond Resorts Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00525
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donnelly v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company et al
as 4:2011cv00300
Plaintiff: Amy Donnelly
Defendant: Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company , Group Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of Sprint/United Management Company and Sprint/United Management Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Woodbine Healthcare and Rehabilitation Centre v. Sebelius et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00645
Plaintiff: Woodbine Healthcare and Rehabilitation Centre, Woodbine Healthcare and Rehabilitation Centre and Woodbine Healthcare and Rehabilitation Centre
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius, Diane Livesay, Margaret T Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Type: Civil Rights None
Independence Operations, LLC v. Sebelius et al
as 4:2009cv00536
Plaintiff: Independence Operations, LLC, Independence Operations, LLC and Independence Operations, LLC
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius, Diane Livesay, Margaret T Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Arbor Place of Festus, Inc. v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv04075
Plaintiff: Arbor Place of Festus, Inc. and Arbor Place of Festus, Inc.
Defendant: Charles E Johnson, Charles E Johnson, Mark Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?