Cases 1 - 10 of 395
Humphrey v. Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
as 6:2024cv03135
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Humphrey v. Missouri State Highway Patrol
as 2:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant:
Missouri State Highway Patrol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Humes v. T-Mobile Security John Doe
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
T-Mobile Security John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Humes v. Kansas City, MO Police Department
as 4:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
Kansas City, MO Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. Strategic Properties, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Strategic Properties, LLC, Nephrite Fund I, LLC, Jesse Davila and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
USA v. Edwards
as 6:2023cv03388
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Samuel Edwards
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Cook v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05106
Plaintiff:
Ralph Edward Cook
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
