Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hilt v. Liberty Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Dallas Cody Hilt
Defendant:
Liberty Police Department, Bledsoe, Heidi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
O'Laughlin v. Smith
as 6:2018cv03168
Petitioner:
Timothy O'Laughlin
Respondent:
Michael D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
O'Laughlin v. Smith
as 6:2017cv03392
Petitioner:
Timothy O'Laughlin
Respondent:
M.D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. O'Laughlin
as 6:2015cv03419
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Timothy O'Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246
O'Laughlin v. Sanders
as 6:2015cv03400
Petitioner:
Timothy P. O'Laughlin
Respondent:
Linda Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
All-American Scaffold, LLC v. Haren & Laughlin Construction Co., Inc.
as 4:2014cv00640
Plaintiff:
All-American Scaffold, LLC
Defendant:
Haren & Laughlin Construction Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Couzens v. Donohue et al
as 4:2014cv00247
Defendant:
William Donohue , The Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights , KC Catholic League, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jon David Couzens, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Granite Re, Inc. v. Haren & Laughlin Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv03242
Plaintiff:
Haren & Laughlin Construction Co., Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and Haren & Laughlin Construction Co., Inc.
Intervenor_defendant:
Granite Re, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Granite Re, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Sims v. Herman et al
as 4:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Ronald B. Sims
Defendant:
Thomas Herman , Linda Laughlin , Blaine Bricker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
