Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Alan Sanderson v. Markel Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv03017
Plaintiff:
Alan Sanderson doing business as Sanderson Homes
Defendant:
Markel Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Pinkins v. Stanton
as 4:2023cv00596
Petitioner:
Markell L. Pinkins
Respondent:
Clay Stanton and Dan Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Those Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's, London et al v. Automobile Acceptance Corporation Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Those Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's, London and Markel International Insurance Company Limited
Defendant:
Automobile Acceptance Corporation Inc. and Eugene J Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hessefort v. Colvin
as 6:2015cv03492
Plaintiff:
Jane Markel Hessefort
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Markel Insurance Company v. Hainen
as 2:2015cv04035
Plaintiff:
Markel Insurance Company
Defendant:
Lance Andrew Hainen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taff et al v. Markel Insurance Company et al
as 4:2014cv00728
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Taff and Layne Taff
Defendant:
Markel Insurance Company and Lance Andrew Hainen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paxton v. Markel Insurance Company et al
as 4:2014cv00727
Defendant:
Markel Insurance Company and Lance Andrew Hainen
Plaintiff:
Ashlee Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Walton
as 6:2012cv03207
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Markell Walton
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246
Hill v. Newton County Jail et al
as 3:2011cv05093
Plaintiff:
Markell Javar Hill
Defendant:
Newton County Jail, Jason Deno, Lacy Whitehall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caton v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv04097
Plaintiff:
Markell K. Caton
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
