Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jones v. Jackson County Detention Center et al
as 4:2015cv00416
Plaintiff:
Gary P Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Jackson County Detention Center, Jay Haden, Kenneth Conlee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. Jackson County Missouri et al
as 4:2013cv01181
Plaintiff:
Gabriel L. Leonard
Defendant:
Jackson County Missouri, Kenneth Conlee, Jackie Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nevels v. Robinson et al
as 4:2013cv00902
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Nevels
Defendant:
Jackie Robinson, Ken Conlee, Baldree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nevels v. Conlee et al
as 4:2013cv00917
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Nevels
Defendant:
Kenneth Conlee, Jackie Robinson, Paul Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Conlee et al
as 4:2013cv00905
Plaintiff:
John L. Williams
Defendant:
Ken Conlee, Jackie Robinson, Paul Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennington v. Robinson et al
as 4:2013cv00901
Plaintiff:
Edward H. Pennington, Jr.
Defendant:
Jackie Robinson, Ken Conlee, Gary Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pennington et al v. Conlee et al
as 4:2013cv00867
Plaintiff:
Edward H. Pennington, Jr., Anthony L. Nevels and John L. Williams
Defendant:
Kenneth Conlee, Jackie Robinson, Paul Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Robinson et al
as 4:2013cv00866
Plaintiff:
John L. Williams
Defendant:
Jackie Robinson, Ken Conlee, Gary Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briggs v. Jackson County Adult Detention Center et al
as 4:2013cv00740
Plaintiff:
LeRoy Keith Briggs
Defendant:
Jackson County Adult Detention Center, Jackson County Detention Center Unknown Employees, Lora Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Conley et al
as 4:2012cv00959
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Simmons
Defendant:
Ken Conley, James McCoy, Patrick Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
