Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Carter v. Huhn et al
as 2:2023cv04142
Plaintiff:
William Billy G Carter
Defendant:
Valerie Huhn, Lee Ann McVay, Mary Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Reitz
as 4:2018cv00995
Petitioner:
George W Fisher
Respondent:
Robert Reitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moreland v. Missouri Department of Mental Health et al
as 5:2016cv06095
Plaintiff:
Chad Eric Moreland
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Mental Health, Eastgate Group Home, Lolita Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. Delmuro et al
as 4:2016cv00598
Plaintiff:
Abel J Hopkins
Defendant:
Justine E Delmuro, Trisha Lacey, David A Suroff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreland v. Missouri Department of Mental Health et al
as 5:2016cv06061
Plaintiff:
Chad Eric Moreland
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Mental Health, Mary Sanders, Hope Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Hunter et al
as 2:2015cv04094
Plaintiff:
William Billy Gene Carter
Defendant:
David R. Hunter, Jairam Das, Sanjiv Sethi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig et al v. Reitz et al
as 2:2013cv04065
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Craig, Walter W. Ritchey and Javier P. Calleja
Defendant:
Robert Reitz, Marty Martin, Mike Mossman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grass v. Kettle et al
as 2:2008cv04127
Plaintiff:
Lloyd E Grass
Defendant:
Janet Kettle, Anne Chambers, Charlene Coe-Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grass v. Reitz
as 4:2007cv00738
Petitioner:
Lloyd Grass
Respondent:
Robert Reitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Schafer et al
as 2:2007cv04175
Plaintiff:
Ira B Harris
Defendant:
Keith Schafer, Department of Mental Health, Joseph Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
