Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00095
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams v. Turner et al
as 1:2019cv00123
Plaintiff:
Austin Adams
Defendant:
Prentiss County, Mississippi, John and Jane Does 1-100, Christina Holley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Zachary et al
as 1:2018cv00128
Defendant:
Colonel Chris Gillard, Other Unknown John and Jane Does 1-10, Deputy "FNU" Westmoreland and others
Plaintiff:
Kameko R. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Clark et al
as 1:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Patrycja Clark
Defendant:
Adam Lee Clark, Brad Vaughn and Brian Pyron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Degaris et al v. Monroe County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2016cv00239
Plaintiff:
Brandy Degaris and Jane Doe Plaintiffs 1-12
Defendant:
Monroe County, Mississippi, Monroe County Sheriff's Department, Cecil Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Harrison et al
as 3:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Moses I. Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
LaShunda Harrison, Alice Stapleton, Blondie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams v. City of Southaven, MS et al
as 3:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
Erika Adams
Defendant:
City of Southaven, MS and Defendants A, B, C, D, E, and F
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saulsberry v. Adams & Edens, P.A. et al
as 3:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
Pamela D. Saulsberry
Defendant:
Adams & Edens, P.A., Bradley P. Jones and Citimortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Yahweh v. Adams et al
as 3:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Yahoshua- Yisrael: Yahweh
Defendant:
Ken Adams, Steve Jubera, John Champion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
