Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Adelsheimer v. Carroll County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Arlene Adelsheimer
Defendant:
Carroll County, Mississippi, Sheriff Clint Walker, Brandon M. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nunn v. Dickerson
as 1:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Archie Nunn
Defendant:
State Trooper John M. Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker et al v. City of Southaven et al
as 3:2021cv00250
Plaintiff:
Keith Alex Walker and Lenneth Cordell Abram
Defendant:
City of Southaven, Jordan P. Roberts, Hunter M. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Sanders et al
as 4:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
David V. Carter
Defendant:
Chancery Court Judge W. M. Sanders, Judge Chancery Court Willie Perkins and Mary Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis et al v. Yalobusha County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00097
Defendant:
Jermaine Gooch, Seven Oaks Funeral Home and Cremation Services, Mark D. Fulco and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Davis, Jr. and Rose M. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
