Cases 91 - 100 of 3,769
Hill *DO NOT FILE* v. Loden
as 3:2023cv00293
Petitioner:
Russell K. Hill DO NOT FILE and Russell Keith Hill
Defendant:
Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Polk v. Monroe County Board of Supervisors et al
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Zachary Polk
Defendant:
Monroe County Board of Supervisors, Kevin Crook, Monroe County Jail Deputies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Burdette v. Mississippi Parole Board
as 4:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Derrick Arthur Burdette
Defendant:
Mississippi Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder v. White et al
as 4:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Carl Holder
Defendant:
Dakota White and Major S. Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Amerson v. Dudley et al
as 4:2023cv00132
Petitioner:
Lee Tommie Amerson
Defendant:
Capt. Robert Dudley, Major Sharon Hampton, Inv. Martha Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Meeks et al
as 4:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Raphael Flowers
Defendant:
Laquita Meeks, Nurse Stewart, K9 Officer Winter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. Dykes
as 3:2023cv00255
Petitioner:
Michael Wallace Pruitt
Respondent:
Warden Dykes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Amerson v. McClure et al
as 4:2023cv00119
Petitioner:
Lee Tommie Amerson
Defendant:
Superintendent Marc McClure and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Parker v. Jackson et al
as 4:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Atiba Parker
Respondent:
Kevin Jackson and Alicia Borp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haughton v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Andrea T. Haughton
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and MDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
