Cases 131 - 140 of 3,763
Anderson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00024
Petitioner:
Marcus Anderson
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Burl Cain and Mississippi Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Chambers et al
as 4:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Derrick Chambers, Jonathan Reynolds, Mrs. Buie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Cain et al
as 4:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Donald Faucett, M.D., Timothy J. Donovan, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Cain et al
as 4:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jamar Allen
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, Marcus McClure and Darowski Mallett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurst v. Hall et al
as 4:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Hurst
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tankersley v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Clarence Tankersley
Defendant:
Brandon Smith, Harold Smith, Penny Hamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Reeves et al
as 4:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Soloman S. Kennedy
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Phil Bryant, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. USA
as 3:2023cv00008
Petitioner:
Dan V. Sharp
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Trotter v. Loden et al
as 4:2023cv00002
Petitioner:
Leon Lamar Trotter
Respondent:
Chad Loden and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lahey v. Union County, MS Sheriff Dept.
as 3:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Garrie Lahey
Defendant:
Union County, MS Sheriff Dept., Jimmy Edwards and Kayla Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
