Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Barber v. Burke et al
as 4:2018cv00149
Defendant:
P. Riley, Dr. James Burke and R. Pennington
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Riley v. Lee et al
as 4:2016cv00120
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Damingo Riley
Defendant:
Earnest Lee and MDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. The Sqwincher Corporation
as 1:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
Matthew Riley
Defendant:
The Sqwincher Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherrill et al v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00146
Plaintiff:
Lori Renee Sherrill , Herbert Cooley , John E. Cooley and others
Defendant:
Owens-Illinois, Inc. and John Doe Defendants 1-500
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riley v. MSP/MDOC et al
as 4:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen Riley
Defendant:
MSP/MDOC, Walker and Gwenddolyn Fair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
Corrina Riley
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. , Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riley v. MCCF/MDOC et al
as 3:2013cv00154
Plaintiff:
Christopher Riley
Defendant:
MCCF/MDOC, Jones, C. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Riley v. Allen et al
as 1:2010cv00174
Petitioner:
James Riley
Respondent:
Barbara Allen and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Manning v. Desoto County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2010cv00051
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Manning
Defendant:
Desoto County, Mississippi, James Albert Riley, Jane Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
